Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 2, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Read provisions of the 287(g) agreement, arguing officers would act under ICE supervision and that 'reasonable suspicion' amounts to profiling.
City Council - Jun 2, 2026 · 38:49 →Asked what federal funds the police department received under the agreement; the chief said the department has received $0 and billed $0, and done nothing for or with ICE.
City Council - Jun 2, 2026 · 1:19:35 →Cited Section 10 of the agreement, arguing local taxpayers would bear costs if enforcement actions occur, and noted the agreement did not exist before the current administration.
City Council - Jun 2, 2026 · 1:21:52 →Walked through facts about the 287(g) agreement, saying it makes information sharing mandatory, puts local officers under ICE command in joint operations, and is not required for reporting offenders. Distributed copies of the agreement to the council.
City Council - May 19, 2026 · 15:33 →Noted the city is the only municipality in Michigan signed onto an ICE community task force agreement via the police chief, with no council vote ever taken, and asked for a recorded vote after nearly a year.
City Council - Apr 7, 2026 · 46:21 →Asked the police chief how many immigrants were turned over to ICE in the last 90 days; the answer was two, and he argued the agreement is unnecessary.
City Council - Apr 7, 2026 · 48:04 →